Agreement Between India And China 2020
After the Galwan collision, Chinese flags and effigies of Supreme Leader Xi Jinping were burned in different locations across India and different groups recorded their protests in different ways.   On October 3, 2020, the Indian Army unveiled a monument to the Indian soldiers who died on June 15 during Operation Snow Leopard in Galwan. News & World Report reported that U.S. Intelligence has assessed that the head of China`s Western Theater Command, General Zhao Zongqi, authorized the fight.  The Taipei Times published an editorial on June 19, 2020, titled “Taiwan Must Stand with India.” The article analyzed the border conflicts between India and China; And concluded: “Taiwan should deepen its relations with India, especially economic, military and intelligence relations, to stem Chinese expansionism and put Xi back in his box.”  Taiwanese also supported India on social media.   A key element of the 1993 and 1996 agreements is that both sides would minimize their armed forces in areas along the LAC, Singh said. However, the agreements do not define the minimum limit. The 1996 agreement restricts the use of important categories of weaponry in the vicinity of the LAC, including tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, guns of 75 mm or more calibre, mortars of 120 mm or more and different missiles. It also limits fighter jets to circumning the LAC within 10 km. It states that no party “opens fire, causes biological degradation, uses hazardous chemicals, detonates or hunts lac with rifles or explosives within a two-kilometre radius.” In 2012, India and China agreed to set up a working mechanism for consultation and coordination to “explore ways to organize and strengthen exchanges and cooperation between military personnel and institutions.” in border areas. The 2013 Border Management Cooperation Agreement lists several mechanisms to clear up misunderstandings and improve communication. Article VI of the agreement prohibits both sides from supporting each other`s patrols “in areas where there is no common understanding of the effective line of control.” .